The Freedom to Religion Bill, 2020 has been approved as an Ordinance by the MP Cabinet.
Similar legislation have previously been approved in Uttar Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh.
What do they have in common:
The declaration of such marriages as "null and void" and the criminalization of conversions performed without the state's prior sanction are similar features of all three statutes.
Differences:
They differ in terms of the severity of the punishment and who bears the responsibility of proving that a conversion is legal.
Previous notice: For a conversion to be valid, the MP Law needs a 60-day prior "statement of the intention to convert" to the District Magistrate, after which a couple of different religions can be legally married.
The Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religious Ordinance, 2020, demands a 60-day notice as well as a police investigation to determine the true intention behind the conversion.
The Himachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act, 2019, which took effect last week, mandates a 30-day "declaration of intention to convert" prior to conversion.
Who can look into it:
The MP Law:
According to Section 4 of the MP Law, a police officer cannot conduct an investigation unless the person converted or the person's parents/siblings file a formal complaint. Under the legislation, no police official below the rank of sub-inspector can investigate a crime.
According to Himachal law:
No prosecution can begin without the approval of a sub-divisional magistrate or a higher-ranking officer.
The UP law:
Allows the same people to submit a complaint as the MP statute.
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
The burden of proof for showing that the conversion was done without compulsion or illegality is placed on the person who was converted under the MP Law.
A comparable clause exists in Himachal legislation.
The UP law goes much farther, shifting the burden of proof from the individual to those who "caused" or "facilitated" the conversion.