In the Supreme Court, a petition was submitted to establish a "universal judicial code" for High Courts across the country to adopt a uniform set of procedures, particularly for virtual courts.
Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay filed a public interest litigation (PIL) petition urging the Supreme Court to take "necessary actions" to adopt a uniform method for case registration, utilize common judicial terminology, phrases, and acronyms, and make the court fee uniform.
It has also requested that the Law Commission of India prepare a report in this respect in conjunction with the High Courts.
"When it comes to categorizing distinct cases, all 25 High Courts use different language," the petition stated.
The PIL argued that different High Courts have varied procedures in cases using virtual courts, which began during the pandemic.
The petitioner further stated that citizens were harmed because court expenses for the same sort of lawsuit varied from state to state.
Mr. Upadhyay contended, "Judicial equality is a constitutional right, and its differentiation based on the jurisdiction of courts breaches the right to equality."